Sound off · Auto-play · Loop
WLTR · Solutions

Four solutions.
One verification layer.

The world’s first deterministic data verification layer

One layer. Every calibration defensible.

WLTR turns raw instrument output into a verified, traceable, QA-approved calibration record. No retyping. No hidden math. No spreadsheet archaeology when an inspector asks for proof.

Deterministic

The same source data produces the same result, every time.

Traceable

Every value links back to immutable raw instrument text.

Defensible

Readiness, exclusions, criteria and QA approval stay with the record.

Deterministic clarity
The verification layer

Raw output becomes an auditable decision.

Instrument
wltr-logo
QA Record
Designed around regulated laboratory reality
EPA 8260
ISO/IEC 17025
GLP
GMP
ALCOA+
Solutions

Four solutions. One verification layer.

Each removes a specific point of failure between the instrument and the signed record.

01

For QA & compliance

Data Integrity

Raw instrument text parsed, hashed and preserved — never retyped.

Raw instrument text is parsed, hashed and preserved — every number traces to its source.

02

For bench analysts

Calibration Intelligence

Testing models and weighting schemes one at a time hides the best fit.

Every candidate model scored against 19 acceptance criteria, with the simplest passing model recommended.

03

For lab managers

Multi-Analyte Visibility

Seventy-two near-identical compound records bury the one that failed.

Whole-group pass/fail triage — reviewers start at the exceptions, not page one.

04

For directors & auditors

Audit Defensibility

Inspections surface decisions nobody documented at the time.

Frozen configs, owned exclusions, named QA approval — evidence stays with the record.

The operational gap

Your instrument builds a curve. It does not prove the curve is right.

Analysts still export results, rebuild calculations in Excel, test weighting schemes by trial and error, hand-check acceptance criteria, and explain undocumented decisions months later. WLTR replaces that vulnerable middle layer.

Instrument software + spreadsheet review

light-black-logo

calibration intelligence

Inside the platform

A cleaner architecture for calibration oversight.

The design is deliberately restrained: source integrity first, computation second, visibility third, approval last. Humans remain responsible for decisions. The system makes those decisions inspectable.

Source preservation

The record starts at the raw text — and is never retyped.

Ingest instrument output directly, parse it deterministically, and store the original text immutably with a SHA-256 hash so every downstream value traces to its source.

app.wltr.io / upload-run

Deterministic model evaluation

Every candidate model. Every analyte. One view.

Evaluate every candidate model for every analyte against 19 acceptance criteria and display the calibration with simultaneous overlays — point-level %Diff, model fit and ICV recovery — without rebuilding the curve by hand.

app.wltr.io / calibration-intelligence

Review by exception

Whole-group visibility. Nothing slips through.

Aggregate calibration curves across every analyte and surface per-analyte pass/fail states, spotlighting trends and anomalies. Reviewers start with the exceptions instead of hunting for them.

app.wltr.io / analyte-mapping

Evidence attached

Audit-ready output for any inspection.

Freeze the method configuration at compute time, log exclusions with user and reason, verify the ICV, and route the completed record through a named QA approval gate.

app.wltr.io / calibration-groups

The controlled workflow

From source text to signed record.

Seven steps replace the fragmented spreadsheet stage without pretending laboratory judgment can be automated out of existence.

Step 01

Configure the laboratory

Define instruments, methods, acceptance criteria, users and QA roles.

Step 02

Upload calibration and ICV runs

Capture raw instrument text, metadata and source hashes before analysis begins.

Step 03

Resolve analyte mappings

Match raw compound names to canonical analytes and preserve aliases for future runs.

Step 04

Build the calibration group

Validate level counts, duplicates, internal standards, ICV attachment and active method configuration.
Step 05

Compute all candidate models

Generate the candidate models for each analyte and evaluate every level against the active criteria.

Step 06

Generate the evidence record

Package selected models, exclusions, ICV performance and method context into a consistent report.

Step 07

Route to QA approval

Complete role-separated review with a named approver and permanent audit timeline.

Published evidence

Manual review has a documented failure rate. That is the point.

of seeded errors missed by a single human reviewer — Panko inspection studies, n=1,025
~ 0 %
manual-entry discrepancy rate vs instrument-interfaced results — JAMIA, 2019
0 %
of FDA drug GMP warning letters cited data integrity — CY2018, Unger analysis
0 %

Review by exception

Whole-group computation makes failed analytes visible immediately instead of burying them in repetitive manual review.

Criteria frozen in context

The active method configuration is snapshotted at compute time, so later changes do not rewrite historical results.

Every exclusion has an owner

Removing a point becomes a recorded decision with who, when and why, not a disappearing spreadsheet row.

Accurate. Traceable. Defensible.

See one calibration move from raw output to QA approval.

Bring a representative instrument export. WLTR will show the source record, candidate models, ICV verification, exceptions and approval trail in one controlled workflow.